TMAH vs. KOH Silicon Etch for MEMS
Two anisotropic etchants, one geometry, very different compatibility. This guide explains how anisotropic silicon etching works, compares the two chemistries, and gives practical guidance for choosing the right etchant for your device.
TMAH and KOH are the two primary anisotropic wet etchants used to bulk micromachine crystalline silicon during MEMS fabrication, sensor manufacturing, and semiconductor wafer processing. In MEMS, anisotropic silicon etching shapes the membranes, cavities, V-grooves, and bulk micromachined structures at the heart of many devices. Both are hot alkaline solutions that etch silicon along its crystal planes, removing material from the (100) and (110) planes far faster than from the (111) planes. That selectivity produces the characteristic angled sidewalls and shapes used for membranes, cavities, and V-grooves. The two etchants reach the same geometry, but they differ in etch rate, anisotropy, surface finish, mask and metal compatibility, and CMOS compatibility, which determine where each one belongs within a MEMS fabrication flow.
Choosing the right silicon etchant is a practical decision that affects masking strategy, metal and device compatibility, etch time, and surface quality. This guide explains how anisotropic silicon etching works, compares the two chemistries, and provides practical guidance for selecting the appropriate etchant for MEMS and related microfabrication applications.
Same Geometry, Two Chemistries
Both etchants are anisotropic alkaline chemistries, so on (100) silicon they both create sidewalls along the (111) planes at the characteristic angle of 54.74 degrees, forming V-grooves, pyramidal pits, trapezoidal cavities, and thin membranes. The difference lies in the chemistry. KOH is an alkali metal hydroxide that carries potassium, while TMAH is a purely organic quaternary ammonium hydroxide that contains no metal ions. That single distinction drives the most important practical difference between them, which is compatibility with CMOS devices.
How Anisotropic Silicon Etching Works
Anisotropic wet etching relies on the crystal structure of silicon. The densely packed (111) planes etch far more slowly than the (100) and (110) planes, so the etch front stalls on the (111) planes and exposes them as smooth, well defined sidewalls. On a (100) wafer this produces sidewalls inclined at 54.74 degrees, which yields V-grooves, pyramidal pits, and trapezoidal cavities depending on the mask opening, and thin suspended membranes when the etch is stopped at a defined depth.
Etch depth is controlled by time and temperature or by an etch stop. Heavily boron doped silicon etches extremely slowly and serves as an etch stop, as does the buried oxide of a silicon on insulator (SOI) wafer, and an electrochemical etch stop can be used to define precise membrane thicknesses. Both etchants are typically masked with a patterned hard mask, with silicon nitride and silicon dioxide the common choices.
How KOH Etching Works
KOH, or potassium hydroxide, is the most established anisotropic silicon etchant. It is usually run at roughly 20 to 45 percent concentration and 70 to 80 degrees Celsius, where it provides the highest silicon etch rate, the highest anisotropy, and the smoothest etched surfaces, all with a simple, economical setup. These qualities make KOH an excellent choice for fast, deep bulk micromachining of V-grooves, cavities, and membranes.
KOH has two important limitations. It etches silicon dioxide relatively quickly, so a thin oxide is not a durable mask for long etches and silicon nitride is preferred. More significantly, KOH contains potassium, an alkali metal ion that can contaminate gate oxides and degrade MOS devices, so KOH is not CMOS compatible and is kept away from CMOS wafers and shared CMOS lines. KOH also attacks exposed aluminum quickly.
How TMAH Etching Works
TMAH, or tetramethylammonium hydroxide, is a purely organic etchant that contains no metal ions. It is typically run at roughly 20 to 25 percent concentration and 80 to 90 degrees Celsius. Because it introduces no mobile metal contamination, TMAH is CMOS compatible and can be used on wafers that carry active devices. It also has very high selectivity to silicon dioxide, so a patterned oxide can serve as the etch mask, and it works well with silicon nitride masks too.
TMAH etches silicon more slowly than KOH and gives slightly lower anisotropy, and its etched surface can develop hillocks and roughness unless the concentration and additives are optimized. A key advantage is metal compatibility: by dissolving silicon and adding a suitable buffering agent, TMAH can be tuned so that exposed aluminum and other metals are essentially untouched during the etch, which makes it well suited to post-CMOS micromachining. Because TMAH is sensitive to native oxide, a brief dip to remove it is common before etching.
How the Two Etchants Differ
Etch Geometry and Etch Stops
Because both etchants follow the same crystal planes, they reach the same fundamental geometry: 54.74 degree (111) sidewalls on (100) silicon, forming V-grooves, trapezoidal cavities, and pyramidal pits. Precise depths and membranes are defined with etch stops. A heavily boron doped layer, the buried oxide of an SOI wafer, and electrochemical etch stops all allow engineers to set membrane thickness reliably. The choice between KOH and TMAH does not change the shape; it changes the etch rate, the mask, and the compatibility with surrounding materials.
CMOS and Post-Processing Compatibility
Compatibility with active devices is often the deciding factor. When silicon must be micromachined on a wafer that already carries CMOS circuitry, or anywhere mobile metal ion contamination cannot be tolerated, TMAH is the appropriate choice because it introduces no metal ions and can be buffered to leave aluminum bond pads and interconnects intact. KOH, with its potassium content and aggressive attack on aluminum, is reserved for dedicated micromachining where no CMOS devices or exposed metals are present.
Etch Masks and How They Affect the Choice
Both KOH and TMAH are hot alkaline baths, so photoresist alone cannot survive the etch and a patterned hard mask is required. The two practical choices are silicon nitride and silicon dioxide, and which one works well depends heavily on the etchant. That makes the mask a real factor in choosing between KOH and TMAH, not just an afterthought.
| Mask material | In KOH | In TMAH |
|---|---|---|
| LPCVD silicon nitride | Excellent; very low etch rate; preferred for long, deep etches | Excellent; very low etch rate |
| Thermal silicon dioxide | Etched relatively quickly; best for shorter or shallower etches, or use a thicker layer | Durable; very high selectivity, so a thin oxide works well |
| PECVD nitride or oxide | Usable, but less dense than furnace films, so it etches faster | Usable; less dense than furnace films |
| Photoresist | Not suitable as the etch mask; degrades in the hot bath | Not suitable as the etch mask; degrades in the hot bath |
The mask interacts with the process choice in several important ways. Because KOH etches silicon dioxide relatively quickly, a long or deep KOH etch usually calls for a silicon nitride mask, which means an LPCVD nitride deposition at high temperature. TMAH, by contrast, has very high selectivity to silicon dioxide, so an oxide already on the wafer can serve as the mask with no added nitride step. It is also worth budgeting for mask loss: in KOH an oxide mask is gradually consumed and must be thick enough to survive the full etch, whereas in TMAH the same oxide is barely touched.
This reinforces the compatibility picture above. The same wafers that rule out KOH for contamination reasons, those already carrying CMOS circuitry or completed metal, often also cannot tolerate a high temperature LPCVD nitride deposition, which leaves an existing oxide as the practical mask. Because TMAH treats that oxide as a durable mask while KOH consumes it, the masking requirement points the same way as device compatibility: toward TMAH for post-metal and CMOS integrated flows. When nitride masking can be added early, before metal, either etchant works and the decision returns to etch rate, surface finish, and cost.
Process Integration
Both etchants fit naturally into MEMS flows alongside masking, deposition, and dry etch steps. A typical flow deposits and patterns a nitride or oxide mask, performs the anisotropic etch to form membranes, cavities, or grooves, and may combine the result with deep reactive ion etching where vertical sidewalls are needed. Selecting the etchant by device compatibility, etch rate, and mask strategy lets engineers match the process to the wafer rather than forcing a single chemistry across every design.
TMAH vs. KOH Silicon Etch at a Glance
| Property | TMAH | KOH |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | Tetramethylammonium hydroxide; organic, metal ion free | Potassium hydroxide; alkali metal hydroxide |
| CMOS compatibility | Yes; no mobile metal ions | No; potassium can contaminate devices |
| Silicon etch rate | Moderate | High |
| Anisotropy | High | Highest |
| Typical conditions | About 20–25 wt%, 80–90 °C | About 20–45 wt%, 70–80 °C |
| Oxide selectivity | Very high; oxide can serve as a mask | Lower; oxide is etched relatively fast |
| Preferred mask | Silicon dioxide or silicon nitride | Silicon nitride |
| Aluminum compatibility | Can be buffered to protect exposed aluminum and other metals | Attacks aluminum quickly |
| Surface finish | Good; can roughen unless optimized | Smoothest |
| Relative cost | Higher | Lower |
| Sidewall geometry | 54.74° (111) planes on (100) silicon | 54.74° (111) planes on (100) silicon |
| Typical applications | Post-CMOS micromachining, membranes, cavities | Bulk micromachining, V-grooves, membranes |
Rogue Valley Microdevices Silicon Etch Options
- Anisotropic wet silicon etch in both KOH and TMAH, run on a dedicated wet etch bench in a class 100 cleanroom.
- Available on 100mm, 150mm, and 200mm substrates.
- LPCVD silicon nitride and thermal oxide masks, matched to the chosen etchant.
- Front to back alignment for membranes, cavities, and through wafer structures.
- TMAH for CMOS compatible and post-metal micromachining; KOH for fast, smooth, economical bulk micromachining.
- Combined with dry etch, including plasma etch and DRIE, where vertical sidewalls are required.
Typical Applications
TMAH
- Post-CMOS and MEMS on CMOS micromachining
- Membranes and cavities near aluminum or metal layers
- Devices that use a silicon dioxide etch mask
- Pressure sensor and microfluidic structures requiring CMOS compatibility
- Contamination sensitive process flows
KOH
- Bulk silicon micromachining
- V-grooves for optical fiber alignment
- Pressure sensor membranes
- Through wafer holes and cavities
- Pyramidal surface texturing
- Fast, economical deep etching
Application Examples
| Application | Typical Etchant Strategy |
|---|---|
| Pressure sensor membranes | KOH or TMAH with a boron or buried oxide etch stop; TMAH where CMOS compatibility is needed. |
| V-grooves for fiber alignment | KOH for fast, smooth (111) sidewalls. |
| Post-CMOS micromachining near aluminum | Buffered TMAH to protect the exposed metal. |
| Deep bulk cavities and through holes | KOH for its high etch rate. |
| Oxide masked anisotropic features | TMAH for its high oxide selectivity. |
Choosing the Right Etchant
Choose TMAH when the wafer carries CMOS devices or must stay free of metal ion contamination, when exposed aluminum or other metals are present during the etch, or when a silicon dioxide mask is preferred. Choose KOH when the priority is the fastest etch rate, the smoothest surfaces, and the lowest cost, and when no CMOS devices or exposed metals are present.
A Simple Selection Workflow
- Does the wafer carry CMOS devices or require freedom from metal ion contamination? Choose TMAH.
- Is exposed aluminum or other metal present during the etch? Choose buffered TMAH.
- Do you need the fastest etch rate, smoothest surfaces, and lowest cost? Choose KOH.
- Do you want to use a silicon dioxide mask? TMAH offers the higher oxide selectivity.
- For the most robust mask in a long KOH etch, use LPCVD silicon nitride.
- Both etchants reach the same (111) geometry, so the choice is usually driven by compatibility, rate, and masking rather than shape.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between TMAH and KOH silicon etch?
Both are anisotropic alkaline etchants that produce the same 54.74 degree (111) sidewall geometry, but KOH is a potassium based etchant that is faster and smoother, while TMAH is an organic, metal ion free etchant that is CMOS compatible.
Why is KOH not CMOS compatible?
KOH contains potassium ions that can contaminate gate oxides and degrade MOS devices, so it is kept away from CMOS wafers and shared CMOS lines.
Can TMAH etch silicon without attacking aluminum?
Yes. TMAH can be buffered with dissolved silicon and additives so that exposed aluminum and other metals are essentially untouched, which makes it suitable for post-CMOS micromachining.
Which mask should I use?
Silicon nitride is the robust mask for both etchants and is preferred for long KOH etches. Because TMAH has very high selectivity to silicon dioxide, an oxide mask can also be used with TMAH.
Which etchant is faster?
KOH generally provides a higher silicon etch rate and the highest anisotropy, while TMAH trades some speed for CMOS compatibility and oxide selectivity.
Talk to a MEMS Foundry
Have a device in development or a process you want to outsource? Rogue Valley Microdevices is a pure play MEMS foundry offering wafer services, thin films, photolithography, metal deposition, and silicon etching on 100mm, 150mm, and 200mm substrates. Contact us to discuss your project and find the right process for your device.